How are agencies handling feature branching and QA testing on Xperience by Kentico SaaS?

The SaaS best practices post recommends trunk-based development with feature flags, since SaaS only gives you one deployment stream (QA → UAT → STG → PROD) and you can't test different features in parallel environments.

I'm curious how other agencies are handling this in practice:

  1. Are you actually doing trunk-based development with feature flags? If so, how are you implementing the flags? appsettings.Qa.json, IsQa(), Microsoft.FeatureManagement, or something custom inside Xperience?
  2. Or are you sticking with Gitflow or release branches and controlling what reaches QA by when you merge?
  3. What do you do when QA is "blocked" by an unfinished feature and a fix needs to go out? Emergency deployments? Reverting?
  4. How do you handle database changes? Flags can hide code, but content types and reusable field schemas in the CD package still get promoted. Additive-only changes? Scoping repository.config per release?
  5. Admin UI customisations: has anyone gated custom apps or UI pages by environment?

We've used a combination of approaches with SaaS - but really want to explore what others are using?

Tags:
CI/CD SaaS

Answers

To response this discussion, you have to login first.